Skip to content
Security QA Vendors

Ranking / Test type

Test automation vendors for security products

Automated regression suites for security products. The facet counts verified security-product cases that describe test automation.

Short answer

DeviQA leads this facet with a facet score of 4.9 of 10, computed from security-product evidence depth, product-class coverage and engagement longevity on this facet's evidence only. Transition Technologies PSC is second with 4.4. Eight of the 12 ranked vendors qualify.

Facet table

Only the dimensions that drive this facet are shown. Dimensions 1, 2 and 4 recomputed on evidence that includes this test type. A vendor qualifies with one verified item; the page is published when at least 3 vendors qualify. Overall scores are on the ranking.
RankVendorFacet score1. Security-product evidence depth2. Product-class coverage4. Engagement longevityFacet evidence
1DeviQALeader4.94.02.010.03
2Transition Technologies PSC4.44.02.08.02
3QA Mentor3.42.02.08.01
4ImpactQA2.54.02.00.01
5QASource1.52.02.00.01
6Codoid1.52.02.00.01
7AgileEngine1.52.02.00.01
8Indium Software1.02.00.00.01

Evidence per vendor

DeviQA

  • Case study for CYDEF: endpoint protection and EDR; functional and automation testing; team of 3; 70 months. [e-0001]
  • Verified review for CYDEF: automation testing; team of 3; 9 months. [e-0002]
  • Verified review for Solebit: automation and API testing; 42 months. [e-0003]

Transition Technologies PSC

  • Case study for an unnamed client: identity and access management; automation testing; team of 10; 41 months. [e-0050]
  • Case study for OneSpan: identity and access management; automation testing; 34 months. [e-0051]

QA Mentor

  • Verified review for an unnamed client: identity and access management; automation testing; 48 months. [e-0071]

ImpactQA

  • Case study for Exostar: identity and access management; automation testing. [e-0041]

QASource

  • Case study for an unnamed client: endpoint protection and EDR; functional, OS, browser or agent compatibility, API and automation testing. [e-0010]

Codoid

  • Case study for an unnamed client: identity and access management; automation and functional testing. [e-0046]

AgileEngine

  • Case study for an unnamed client: SOAR and incident response; functional, automation and API testing. [e-0038]

Indium Software

  • Case study for an unnamed client: automation and API testing. [e-0025]

What to ask vendors for this facet

  • Ask what share of the regression suite ran on every build in the vendor's last security engagement, and how flaky tests were handled.
  • Ask who owns the automation code at the end of the contract and in which repository it lives.
  • Ask how the suite covered agent or platform behaviour that a UI test cannot reach.

Related pages

Scores are computed from publicly available evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They describe published evidence, not service quality. Re-verify with the vendor before contracting.