Skip to content
Security QA Vendors

Ranking / Compare

DeviQA vs QA Mentor

Short answer

DeviQA scores 44.8 and ranks 1; QA Mentor scores 32.4 and ranks 3 of 12. They differ most on test-type depth: DeviQA 6.0, QA Mentor 2.0 out of 10. QA Mentor: One test type evidenced on security products: automation.

Eight dimensions side by side

Scores out of 10 from the frozen methodology. The difference column is A minus B.
DimensionA: DeviQAB: QA MentorDifference (A minus B)
1. Security-product evidence depth4.02.0+2.0
2. Product-class coverage2.02.0±0.0
3. Test-type depth6.02.0+4.0
4. Engagement longevity10.08.0+2.0
5. Third-party review signal0.03.0−3.0
6. Vendor's own security posture1.00.0+1.0
7. Team scale and specialisation6.06.0±0.0
8. Transparency7.55.0+2.5

Security-product evidence side by side

DeviQA

  1. e-0001

    case-studyCase study for CYDEF, endpoint protection and EDR

    deviqa.com · undated · B single source · verified 2026-11-11

    Endpoint protection and EDR; tests: functional, automation; team: 3; duration: 70 months; client: CYDEF; vendor-reported metric: 98% test coverage achieved for the desktop agent

  2. e-0002

    reviewClutch review by CYDEF

    clutch.co · 2021-05-20 · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    tests: automation; team: 3; duration: 9 months; client: CYDEF

  3. e-0003

    reviewClutch review by Solebit

    clutch.co · 2018-08-27 · B single source · verified 2026-11-11

    tests: automation, api; duration: 42 months; client: Solebit

QA Mentor

  1. e-0071

    reviewClutch review, identity and access management

    clutch.co · 2024-01-08 · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    Identity and access management; tests: automation; duration: 48 months; client not named

Choose one or the other

Choose DeviQA when

  • You need functional testing and API testing evidenced on a security product (test-type depth, 6.0 against 2.0). DeviQA: Three test types evidenced on security products: functional, automation, api. [e-0001][e-0002][e-0003] QA Mentor: One test type evidenced on security products: automation. [e-0071]
  • You want named leadership with profiles before the first call (transparency, 7.5 against 5.0). DeviQA: Three of four items present: public rate, named leadership with profiles, team locations; missing: published QA process page. [e-0005][e-0009] QA Mentor: Two of four items present: public rate, team locations; missing: named leadership with profiles, published QA process page. [e-0072]
  • More published security-product cases weigh most for you (security-product evidence depth, 4.0 against 2.0). DeviQA: Three verified security-product QA items, two of them older than 60 months and counted at half. Of these, three name the client, three state team size or duration and one states a metric. [e-0001][e-0002][e-0003] QA Mentor: One verified security-product QA item. Of these, zero name the client, one states team size or duration and zero state a metric. [e-0071]

Choose QA Mentor when

  • You want recent verified reviews of security-product QA work (third-party review signal, 3.0 against 0.0). QA Mentor: One verified platform review of security-product QA work within 60 months; newest dated 2024-01-08. [e-0071] DeviQA: No verified Clutch, GoodFirms or G2 review of security-product QA work dated within 60 months.

Next steps

Scores are computed from publicly available evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They describe published evidence, not service quality. Re-verify with the vendor before contracting.