Skip to content
Security QA Vendors

Ranking / Compare

ImpactQA vs TestArmy

Short answer

ImpactQA scores 22.1 and ranks 8; TestArmy scores 19.4 and ranks 10 of 12. They differ most on team scale and specialisation: ImpactQA 3.0, TestArmy 0.0 out of 10. TestArmy: Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; not QA-only, 0 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points.

Eight dimensions side by side

Scores out of 10 from the frozen methodology. The difference column is A minus B.
DimensionA: ImpactQAB: TestArmyDifference (A minus B)
1. Security-product evidence depth4.04.0±0.0
2. Product-class coverage2.02.0±0.0
3. Test-type depth2.02.0±0.0
4. Engagement longevity0.00.0±0.0
5. Third-party review signal0.00.0±0.0
6. Vendor's own security posture0.00.0±0.0
7. Team scale and specialisation3.00.0+3.0
8. Transparency5.05.0±0.0

Security-product evidence side by side

ImpactQA

  1. e-0041

    case-studyCase study for Exostar, identity and access management

    impactqa.com · undated · B single source · verified 2026-11-11

    Identity and access management; tests: automation; client: Exostar; vendor-reported metric: Reduce QA Test Cycle by 60%

TestArmy

  1. e-0054

    reviewClutch review by Password Crypt ApS, cryptography and key management

    clutch.co · 2020-03-24 · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11

    Cryptography and key management; tests: functional; client: Password Crypt ApS

Choose one or the other

Choose ImpactQA when

  • You want a QA-only company (team scale and specialisation, 3.0 against 0.0). ImpactQA: Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; QA-only company, 3 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points. [e-0043] TestArmy: Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; not QA-only, 0 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points.

Choose TestArmy when

No dimension where TestArmy leads by 2 points or more.

Next steps

Scores are computed from publicly available evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They describe published evidence, not service quality. Re-verify with the vendor before contracting.