Ranking / Vendor profile

ELEKS

Overall score: 28.4 / 100, rank 6 of 12
Headquarters: Tallinn, Estonia [e-0034]
Headcount range: Not confirmed by two sources
QA-only company: No, also sells development or other services [e-0037]
Evidence verified on: 2026-11-11

Not ideal for

Situations where the published evidence does not support this vendor. Each line links to its source.

Buyers who need QA across several security product classes: the only evidenced case covers one endpoint security client. [e-0033]
Buyers who need automation or API testing on a security product: the evidenced case names manual, performance and compatibility testing only. [e-0033]
Buyers who need a QA-only vendor: ELEKS also sells software development and consulting. [e-0037]

Security-product QA evidence

Case studies and reviews that describe QA work on a product whose primary purpose is security. Penetration testing for other clients is excluded under the methodology.

e-0033
case-studyCase study for ESET, endpoint protection and EDR
eleks.com · undated · C indirect · verified 2026-11-11
Endpoint protection and EDR; tests: performance, compatibility; team: 30 plus; client: ESET

Score breakdown

Eight dimensions, each scored 0 to 10 by the frozen rules and multiplied by its weight. Bars are drawn from data/scores.json.

1 Security-product evidence depth weight 204.0 / 10
One verified security-product QA item. Of these, one names the client, one states team size or duration and zero state a metric. [e-0033]
2 Product-class coverage weight 122.0 / 10
One product class evidenced: Endpoint protection and EDR. [e-0033]
3 Test-type depth weight 154.0 / 10
Two test types evidenced on security products: performance, compatibility. [e-0033]
4 Engagement longevity weight 100.0 / 10
No engagement length with a security vendor is stated in the verified evidence.
5 Third-party review signal weight 120.0 / 10
No verified Clutch, GoodFirms or G2 review of security-product QA work dated within 60 months.
6 Vendor's own security posture weight 103.0 / 10
Evidenced: SOC 2 Type II stated (2025). ISO 27001 is claimed without a certificate number. [e-0035]
7 Team scale and specialisation weight 90.0 / 10
Headcount not confirmed by two consistent sources, 0 points; not QA-only, 0 points; no dedicated security-product QA page, 0 points.
8 Transparency weight 127.5 / 10
Three of four items present: public rate, published QA process page, team locations; missing: named leadership with profiles. [e-0034][e-0036]

Product classes covered

Verified security-product QA items per class. A class counts only when the source names the product type, for example EDR¹ for endpoint or SIEM² for detection platforms.

Product class	Evidence items
Endpoint protection and EDR	1
SIEM, XDR and detection platforms	0, no evidence
Identity and access management	0, no evidence
Network security	0, no evidence
Email and web security	0, no evidence
Data protection and backup	0, no evidence
Vulnerability and exposure management	0, no evidence
SOAR and incident response	0, no evidence
Cryptography and key management	0, no evidence
Mobile and application security products	0, no evidence

Test types evidenced on security products: performance or load and OS, browser or agent compatibility. [e-0033]

1 EDR: Software that watches laptops, servers and phones for suspicious behavior, records what it sees, and alerts administrators so they can investigate and respond. Source
2 SIEM: A system that collects log data from many sources into one place so security teams can search it, correlate events and spot attacks. Source

Vendor's own security posture

Controls a security vendor usually asks of a QA partner that will handle builds and test data.

ISO 27001: Claimed, certificate reference not published [e-0035]
SOC 2: SOC 2 Type II, stated for 2025 [e-0035]
Test-data handling: Not published
Security page or officer: Not published

Transparency

The four items scored in dimension 8 of the methodology.

Public rate: $50 to $99 / hr [e-0034]
Leadership: Not published with profiles
QA process page: Published [e-0036]
Team locations: Tallinn, Estonia; L'viv, Ukraine; Kraków, Poland [e-0034]

Compare and browse

The two vendors nearest by overall score, and the facet pages that list this vendor.

ELEKS vs TestDevLab TestDevLab overall 28.5
Codoid vs ELEKS Codoid overall 28.1
Endpoint protection and EDR facet page
Compatibility testing facet page
Europe facet page
RFP questions to send this vendor
How to shortlist a QA vendor for a security product
Full ranking of 12 vendors

Logged corrections: changelog. Raw evidence: data download.

Scores are computed from publicly available evidence as of the verifiedOn date on each item. They describe published evidence, not service quality. Re-verify with the vendor before contracting.